Digg! Scott Brown 24-Hours Later! Health Care For Everyone!

understand how the republicans didn't see that the joke was on them. They honestly thought Brown was some big victory. Research people. Research. I definately told some people so on that one.

I don't have to keep lying to get votes.

Everyone already knew that Brown was for health care reform and that he supported RomneyCare.

The current system does not offer people freedom of choice. Current federal laws regarding health insurers violate the commerce clause of the US Constitution in which one of the powers given the Federal government is to "regulate" commerce between the states. Nothing in the word regulate means "protect a monopoly."

It is my belief that Brown will work to facilitate health care between the states and pave thwe way for each state to effectively and efficiently implement their own version of RomneyCare if they so choose.

As a nation in an ever shrinking world, health care is an important aspect of national defense which cannot be ignored. If our predecessors on this continent had some form of health plan, the European colonizers would not have been able to unleash germ warfare through smallpox infected blankets. Shall we leave ourselves vulnerable to the next group of invaders? Nukes and guns and airport security cannot protect us from the inevitable invisible threat which will one day depopulate this continent once again and allow another foriegn invader to conquer it.

That the voters in Massachusetts are informed and aware to a degree that they can attempt to change the status quo, but they're not informed to the degree where they can make the right decisions. But the general direction is good. Like I mentioned under a different thread, Brown's timing election success struck fear with many establishment politicians and all of a sudden 13 democrats are panicking on Bernanke confirmation and there is now increased momentum for the Fed audit push before his final confirmation deadline. As for those who bicker among the liberty movement themselves on whether to vote for the lesser of the two evils. One, the impact of a minimal amount of votes is really just that--minimal, therefore it seems impractical to me to trade off principle for a marginal impact on the outcome, however if my one vote decides the election outcome, I will vote for the lesser of the two evils. And two: in the scenario in which the liberty movement itself is not pervasive enough that people still have to go back to the square one argument on whether to trade away principles, it seems that itself is a symptom that uninformed voters are still too vast, and energy is better focused on spreading the message, rather than bickering over an issue one has no control of. Those of us more informed above the crowd willingly place ourselves in an "unfair" situation where when it comes down to the voting booth, our votes take a toll on our sense of intellectual and moral responsibility if it is realized that a certain compromise have to be made for a marginally more desirable outcome. Like I mentioned however, the movement is not even at the point yet where that is really the question until we reach perhaps some 20% of the population. Save the debate for when that happens as we've only caught a glimpse of it so far. The best way is to simply grow the movement, so that circumstance can be avoided altogether, and that to me is a both principled and practical approach.

i was 1 of the 20000

You didn't vote for Martha Coakley.

You didn't vote for Scott Brown.

You didn't fail to vote.

You voted for the issues. End the wars, audit the Fed, competing currencies, a balanced budget with free and open markets.

Over 20,000 Tea Party members raise their voices!

old news. ron paul said to get on the phoneto keep audit the fed from dying. it may be to late after tonite.

Scott Brown said all this same stuff before the election.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJEEQHOnI2Q

notice the digg link earlier...dugg @ 44...

In his victory speech he kept saying "We can do better" - so he was never totally against a health care plan. And supposedly the people of Massachussetts don't like their Romney health care, it's too expensive, yet Romney was helping this guy on the QT, as was our buddy John McCain. So what's with that?

Not much interest in this Digg.

Oh look, voting for the other party didn't work out for 10 billionth time.

establishment pig.

Standard operating procedure for vetting of acceptable Zionist candidates. I would use this position and not change a word if I were running for a top political office. A say one thing and do the opposite type of deal.

Position Paper on The United States - State of Israel Relationship
http://www.solomonia.com/blog/images/2010/01/scottbrownisrae...

.

He didn't know he had to wait at least a week, before lying to the American people.

too rich not to share...I sent a quick article to my local newspaper, with the youtube link, about Brown's 24-hour-later flip-flop...
...asking when would WE THE PEOPLE learn to vote for Country instead of party...

This is the result of pragmatist voters. The majority buying chains for the minority who refused them, invoking their right to live and be left alone.

Democrat.Republican. It's all the same. Big Government. More taxes. More spending. More WARS. Banks and Corporations get all the money.You get enough to barely survive so you can slave for them.

Hey, don't take it so hard!

I hope that nobody actually thought that this Bush/ McCain/ Palin wannabe was REALLY a Constitutional conservative or a libertarian! People who already knew this voted, as they should have, for Joe Kennedy. People who had yet to learn this, merely voted against Miss Coakley. In one sense, even electing that neocon member of the stupid party to the Senate was an accomplishment.

The tea party movement, Ron Paul and his Campaign4Liberty, the Libertarian and Constitution Parties, and other sources of independent politics can only grow as more and more Americans, both in and outside of the Peoples Republic of Taxachusetts see Comrade Brown as he is in all his neocon glory!

Hold your noses!!

The Republican Party may indeed one day be a real alternative to the warfare/welfare state democrazy that we did so much to get ourselves and our children into. But it will take many more Ron Paul types, and fewer--a LOT fewer--worthless Sarah Palin/Scott Brown/Mitt Romney type neocons! Real Americans will have to make the difference.

The election of this useless neocon as the replacement to the odious Ted Kennedy shows us that we have made a good first step, but only the first step,and a big job lies ahead, both in Massachusetts, and around the country!

PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
David K. Meller

If he this turns out to be a McCain, Lindsey Graham type Republican. The Tea Party movement, Republican Party, small government revolution, etc. will be totally destroyed. This man has a huge responsibility for the next 10 months, DON'T SCREW IT UP Senator Brown.

He said nothing that has not been said all along..
He is a smooth, finely polished, individual , in Obama's league...The tea party is NOT the Paul party & the massage is clear. You will get some kind of Healthcare bill, throwing your prefferences to the Wolves...MY healthcare is MY business, not the governments..I can regulate my own premium $$$ by buying or not buying ..Forcing me into something else does me NO good service ..The Elites cannot take care of the elderly proprly,now; how are they going to give "ALL" Americans proper care ? Let them start a business,first; for those who do not have healthcare.. Let us see if they can manage a business properly ..So far they cannot handle SSI & Medicare too well...All they are after is our premium payments, then ration out care to those who have connections..Pre-existing condition persons will drain the bank unless care is rationed ..Think about it ..How far in debt are all the industrialized nations because of national healthcare? Where do the people of the World, NOW, turn,to get proper treatment ..Kill any bill & Let me lead myself, as it was intended in the Constitution..
I've been driving a truck like his for quite some time ..It didn't impress me..
If you are not for me, the individual , you are against me..Simple

It was too good to be true. It stands to reason that this guy, coming out of nowhere like he did, couldn't have won against "the machine". BHO looked way too happy on his interview with snuffleupagus last night.I've never seen him smile so much. So they handed us a sop, and they will now try to convince us that it's what we want.

The party strategy here and into the future, is in perfect sync with Quigley's prophetic description of the NWO/CFR methods of replacing evil with evil every four years. This is to assure the progression towards global tyranny, global money control just like the dark ages of Kings and feudal systems, assuring the progressive and continuous direction of the ship of state away from constitutional limited government with all of it's ramifications to the contrary!

One strategy towards this end we have just seen in the GOP and DNC collaborative rescue of the Senate seat from the threat of a true liberty candidate acquisition!

This was accomplished by having the democratic wane in strength while the GOP grows... all supposedly from the outgrowth of the Tea Party influence! This is also seen in Palin being used to support the GOP incumbent governor in Texas against the liberty candidate who represents the true grassroots and Tea Party interests, pretending at the same time to be defeating the democratic party!

The end result of all this maneuvering is the impression left with the rest of the GOP and some liberty minded Dems, that the GOP as a 'party' is now positioned to win, for the people, for the Tea Parties, for liberty! All while running AGAIN under the banner of the 'fuhrer princep' RATHER than the banner of truth and liberty, limited constitutional government, sound money, ending the FED, ending the Income Tax, ending all the alphabet soup agencies without the authority to exist under sound constitutional exegesis!

Bottom line is the people will become more happy, more comfortable, more content, and MORE ASLEEP, towards their duty to stand on the walls of the city of liberty and discern between party and truth, between pablum and principle, between liberty candidates proven best by test, rather than deceitful and ignorant candidates without one iota of demonstrable proof in word, stand or deed, that they are as true to liberty principles, as they are attempting to appear!

Beware... both parties are rising to defeat the life of liberty, to defeat all but party followers and globalist/socialist candidates who will not rock the boat of the CFR/NWO!

As such it is paramount that the liberty and grassroots movements learn the distinctions between true liberty candidates and the party patsy's!

Make the candidates step forward and raise their hands publicly in assent to ENDING the FED, ENDING the Income Tax with NO FLAT TAX REPLACEMENT, barring all war with out lawful declaration, bringing troops home who are not essential to the DECLARED war; Producing sound gold and silver backed money of account, ending ALL federal government involvement in all things not specifically enumerated in Article I Section 8... I could go on, but you get the drift!

When good men are asked to stand for truth, it will become clear if they are good constitutional liberty candidates, and those who have recently discovered the meaning of the constitution, are not to be trusted quite frankly, and even if truthful, need to take their place in support of those who supported the Truth all along... in other words those who stood for a Paul presidency when the chips were down!

He advocated health care for everyone during his campaign. He was just against the current bill up for vote and "bringing it back to the drawing board" was the way to go.
It is pointless to discuss his loyalty to one health care reform over another.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJEEQHOnI2Q

Reading through the comments reveals just how much many too often are blazing their guns in the dark. Refocus your resources!

EDIT: Perfectly demonstrated by comment above (JSBach).

We're talking about Massachusetts.

Even if Brown is just as bad as a Democrat, the psychological effect on the Democrat Party socialists is bound to be demoralizing.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/122167

I said, "you watch." It sure didn't take him long.

Never vote to block a greater evil. Vote for what you want. This guy is rotten to the core, and wishful voting never works.

IT'S A LIE!

At best, the ballot box is a suggestion box to those that place people in power.

And the powers that be chose someone who talked the conservative talk to satiate the conservative voters. Brown (a fake conservative) is simply a pacifier.

Let me tell you something that some of you know, if you want real change, real conservatives in power, then we have to use the only real power that we have...force.

The problem is that almost none of us are willing to use force because THINGS AREN'T BAD ENOUGH. That's right, the powers that be (the NWO) have created a pretty decent lifestyle for us. It isn't exactly what we want, but we won't draw blood over it, cuz it actually pretty nice.

Since we know that we don't really have barely any political power, we are stuck with the choice of just going along, force, or pretend that we have real political power. Sadly, the vast majority of us do the later.