HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Why the Hell is Tucker Carlson invited to speak at the Minnesota Rally?

The same guy who made the hit piece that lost Ron Paul many votes the night before NH. The news piece on the faked News letters and calling Ron Paul a racist. Also the hitpiece on the "Hookers, prostitutes and sluts for Ron Paul"(btw I wasnt referring to any article. I was referring to a video hit piece that was done on Tucker's show. Prostitutes and whores for RP. It was also aired on ABC nightly news after tucker started it
Why was this imbecile invited to speak at a huge Ron Paul event?

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I think he was fired because

I think he was fired because of supporting Ron Paul. Obviously whoever invited and approved him coming feel the same way.

Please Remember...

Tucker Carlson was FIRED from MSNBC less than a week later, after saying on air, that he was voting for Ron Paul NO MATTER WHAT - even if he had to write him in.
You don't see any other lame stream media reporter out there making a bad ass statement like that on one of the major networks. He stood up for his belief in Ron Paul & paid the ultimate price...FIRED.

(He also called Obama a personality cult leader)

Dear Lacandy Tucker wasnt fired because of his Ron Paul

Support. He made a comment about Hitlary Clinton and her campaign manager made him look like a fool on National Tv
Tucker was also fired from CNN after Jon Stewart(a liberal) made him and his cohost look like children in a school play. He disgraced them for their divisive rhetoric and bitch slapped them both.
Im ashamed to say hes a Conservative. He needs to grow up this little kid

He also lost his bowtie after Jon Stewart bitch slapped im on National Tv
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?...

Yawwnnnnn...

yeah...it was coincidence I guess; An MSNBC reporter being fired a few days after for stating he's VOTING for Ron Paul no matter what - even though the MSM has a black-out on Ron Paul. (How much coverage did we receive this past Sat. in D.C.)??

BTW - that Jon Stewart bowtie-play was A LONG TIME AGO.

I guess if Ron Paul wants Tucker Carlson & APPROVES of this decision to have him as an MC/Speaker then who are you to question it? I'm positive Ron Paul knows more than the rest of us posting here.

its true. But is it really Ron Paul wo personally invited him

or is it his campaign?
Am I not allowed to voice my opinion?
Shall I be an obedient revolutionary who does group thinking? Or should I think for myself?
Even if you were right and Dr Paul personally invited Carlson as much as I like Dr Paul dosent mean I cant disagree or voice. Also dosent mean I worship the Good Doc. thnks for listening. Thnks for voicing your opinion. Ill consider your words
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?...

whoa...

Sensitive.
Do you honestly think that his staff could book someone w/out his approval? I would keel over if he let his staff approve McLame as a keynote speaker; (As well this board would be up in arms)!

If you post an Active Forum Topic, be prepared for feedback; It's all about the opinion.

Thanks for reading.

Lacandy I lost faith in even his congressional staff after

They made Ron Paul endorse a white supremacist from California. The media made a field day with it. The LA times and the Communist Huffington Post.
They emabarassed Ron Paul and made him make a press release cancelling his endorsement. Incompetent staff. He trusts them. But my critisism is of Carlson and the staff. Carlson needs to live with criticism and appologise to Ron Paul for playing along against him with the Corporate shills
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?...

How long...

have you been a RP supporter? His staff did not "MAKE" him do anything? Do you really think he is this incompetent or senile???

What "white supremacist" did RP support? If you're speaking of Don Black then you did not listen to Ron Paul's decision for keeping the donation --- it was to keep "racist money" for his R3VOLution message & to PREVENT it from being used to further promote white supremacy/racism.

Ron Paul is extraordinarily intelligent and if you think he just blindly trusts his staff, then you can't have studied his politics very long.

Tucker Carlson is not part of his "staff." He just decided to tour w/ Dr. Paul since he was such a huge supporter.

P.S. Are you typing w/ your elbows or are you just tired?

here is the guy you are looking for

~
He was on the ballot in Los Angeles. Ron Paul chose not to endorse Bill Johnson and I do not know about other Ron Paul supporters, but some of us decided it unwise to vote for him as it had only been several years since he had renounced his troubling past and it was much too soon for him to be running for office. Also, we sure as hell did not need this kind of publicity.

Ron Paul statement on the Bill Johnson campaign, and more
http://opinion.latimes.co...
____

www.dvds4delegates.com = Ron Paul, the 44th U.S. President _★

Lacandy again I have to prove myself

You make your own judgement. I havent heard of Ron Paul untill 2 years ago from Alex Jones. Now Im a hardcore supporter who campaigned for him with all I have and I dont have much
heres the proof and NO it wasnt the Don Black incident or the Bill White (AKA William Weiss the Zionist White Supremacist who works for the ADL and AIPAC).
heres the incident. It was a man named Bill Johnson. Im not saying Ron Paul is incompetent but he has incompetent people working for him or agent provacateurs who are sabotaging his campaign and reputation on purpose
http://www.reason.com/blo...
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?...

Spec,Dave,John,JFEJ,Boom… You Guys Are Great

Below I asked the question, meant to be rhetorical: What are we building?

You answered.

Here’s a parable which your soaring responses inspired in response to my own question:

Two bricklayers were seen laying their bricks one by one. When each was asked what they were building, the one who grimaced as he stooped to lift each block and slather the mortar grunted: “a wall”. The other stepped back from his careful attention to task, looked up toward the sky, and with a gleam in his eye, proudly exclaimed: “a cathedral.”
,
Thank you to those gentlemen and ladies in this project who take the high road and envision arches, steeples and majestic light through tall windows… and also for not barking at the passers by to kiss your buttresses.

A cathedral has lots of open space.

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

If you like this … I couldn’t resist giving you an oncor, especially one capturing the different drummer, eclectic diversity, building to a crescendo of harmony, which I feel captures the sublime spirit of this movement.

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

I think you are overreacting

Yes, the issue was the "bunny ranch" issue was not so helpful, but he probably meant to get more support. Of course it may have pushed some voters away. But then again, some of them may may also be pushed away by Dr. Paul's critique on the drug war. This does not mean Dr. Paul promotes the use of drug use, just as he does not advocate prostitutes. The church and other morals institutions should preach against it and set the example.
Remember, there was no picture taken of Dr. Paul with any of the prostitutes etc, so it was not damaging in that sense. And as a Christian, I believe the Word of God is for all people, including prostitutes.

Tucker Carlson did a good job in promoting Dr. Paul. He admitted voting for him in 1988. MSNBC probably had a lot of pressure on him to be critical as well and create issues, you know how superficial they can be.

You do not ask why Tucker Carlson lost his job/was fired? He was supposed to do an interview with Dr. Paul, and then came an issue, I think it was Elliot Spitzer's revelation. He is a well known personality, and who knows, he may be a candidate for congress as a Ron Paul Republican in two year's time.

You got this guy all wrong. You've got Ron Paul all wrong.

The Ron Paul revolution is comprised of hookers and Hindus and pot heads and gun nuts and home schoolers, bikers and writers and gays and people just pissed off at the omnipotent state.
But the common denominator is that they are all smart enough to know about rights, and self ownership and that interference in voluntary relationships between adults is not a proper role of government.
That my Ron Paul would stridently defend a prostitutes' rights of self ownership while ignoring a cry of religous intolerance from a far larger more politically powerful interest group puts him squarely in the company of the greatest charismatic people of all history.

You know who I'm talking about.

Tucker knows it. You should too.

"For" or "Against"?

I have to stop to wonder about the people who are looking for enemies. Historically, the freedom movement worldwide has had no shortage of enemies. I see no need to go looking for more. I am excited that the principles of liberty are gaining such traction now, and I am excited about the prospect of making POSITIVE changes, and doing POSITIVE things. Is the glass half empty or half full?

I am not against the Fed (well ... okay maybe a little!), but I am FOR sound money. I am not against the government, I am FOR the Constitution. Make no mistake, we are fighting, but we will win this fight when we start giving and start befriending. In relation to the news media, maybe going for a few drinks or lunch would get us better coverage than winning an argument.

I've seen both good coverage and bad coming from Tucker. If he wants to come speak at our convention, and Ron Paul will have him, then I say let's buy the man a beer, hang out, and talk Constitution!

T. Carlson, Baldwin, Barr etc... are on our side

Let's start celebrating everyone that is embracing liberty instead ridiculing them. Let's stop all the trashing of Baldwin, Barr, and T. Carlson because they are in this fight with us, and they help the liberty movement gain recognition and traction in order to bring our movement into fruition in the fastest time frame possible.

Honestly

I don't think some of you guys are happy unless you turn everyone away from us. It's like we're swimming upstream and everyone who starts to help us gets attacked for their past, or not being dedicated enough....no one is allowed to change and join us because we're always looking for the conspiracy. Can we just let some of these people contribute to our movement without executing them as soon as they start to agree with us? Please....please lay off the ones that seem to be helping us.

"The wicked flee when no man pursueth, but the righteous are as bold as a lion."

Watch the video of Jon

Watch the video of Jon Stewart talking with Tucker Carlson. This guy is a joke.

"How old are you?"
"35"
"And you wear a bowtie!"

Another divisive hit piece from NotOverYet

NotOverYet should have been banned months ago, and here he goes again with his unbelievably absurd commentary.

For starters, Ron Paul has the final say on who is speaking. Who is better qualified to determine who should speak: Ron Paul, or NotOverYet? Once you embrace that concept, you need to zip shut your word hole, son. All you're doing is stirring up problems within the movement. The decision has been made by Dr. Paul, who is qualified to make that decision, and your harsh criticism only makes us less effective as a political force.

More specifically, you're off base with your constant criticism of Tucker Carlson. I read the same piece you did. I didn't see it as a hit piece. Few objective people saw it your way. Ron Paul didn't see it your way. Tucker Carlson is a friend of the movement and a friend of Ron Paul.

You have every right to disagree with me on the value of his piece. You can think "his piece wasn't the right way to help the movement." As a political professional, I'd disagree with you. But you're free to make that determination. You cross the line when you solidify that opinion as fact, and then extend it to "Tucker Carlson is an enemy, and it doesn't matter what Ron Paul thinks -- I will take steps to bring him down."

You're cutting off your nose to spite your face. Let it go.

As I have said time and time again, if you're not a troll trying to sabotage this movement, you're doing a GREAT job imitating one.

Grow up Jack.

Just because you disagree with someone's point of view is no reason to ban them.

listen dude. Ban me. hang me. do it if you can

this isnt the first time you leave an asinine comment like your self on one of my writings. The only one trolling is you. Im voicing my opinion. Also pls dont lie and say Ron Paul invited the speakers. Its probly is office. You think he has time to pick speakers at his convention and decide who will be there and who wont?
btw I wasnt referring to any article. I was referring to a video hit piece that was done on Tucker's show. Prostitutes and whores for RP. It was also aired on ABC nightly news after tucker started it
__________
Video message from Dr. Chuck Baldwin to all his fellow Revolutionaries
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Limited Edition

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

What are we building ?

Here is a fun edition that should be even more of a wake up:

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Its Ron's Show

The article you mentioned in parenthesis doesn't seem to exist. Perhaps you are referring to this endearing, humorous, and well written piece by Tucker Carlson. It does make light of RP, his supporters, and things along the campaign trail but there is a love and respect for RP running through it. "Pimp My Ride" http://www.tnr.com/politi...

I can think of no other TV host who expressed as much admiration and support for Ron Paul over a period of time as Tucker Carlson. Was he perfect? No. There were probably pressures in him from his corporate bosses and he had to at least seem to be objective.

Ron Paul probably has more insight into his relationship with Tucker Carlson than you or I and it is his show.

No I didnt mean that article. I meant a hitpiece Tucker did

on his show. It was prostitutes and whores for Ron Paul
too bad I cant find the video anymore. It really hurt Ron Paul with the Christian vote
__________
Video message from Dr. Chuck Baldwin to all his fellow Revolutionaries
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

PROVE IT

Since you're unwilling to look at reason here, why don't we address this from another angle.

Give us evidence that:

1. This "really hurt Ron Paul with the Christian vote."

2. Tucker Carlson actually ran a "hit piece." This would mean he approved it and it was intended to harm Ron Paul.

And to preempt you, I don't want to hear "from personal experience..." or "in my judgment..." You've already shown you lack judgment.

You lack judgment in that you can't distinguish comedy and satire from malice.

You lack judgment in that you (incorrectly) feel you're more qualified to pass judgment on Tucker Carlson's commitment to liberty and suitability to speak at this rally than Ron Paul himself (Yeah, I read your "Ron Paul 'prolly' [sic] didn't personally approve Tucker." Again, prove it. Are you really expecting us to believe that Ron Paul's designates were in charge and that they went against Ron Paul's wishes?).

You lack judgment in that you make all these huge logical leaps, many of which defy common sense, and then you're so confident in your conclusions that you're willing to engage in the politics of destruction. You are hurting this movement by attacking prominent players and alienating those who support/like them,

Even if you're right on so many levels (that Tucker's piece hurt Ron Paul, that Ron Paul didn't approve him speaking, etc.), you still have no way of proving that it was Tucker's intent. Just because you don't "get it" doesn't mean everyone sees the world your way. Even if Tucker's attempt at humor missed the mark, that doesn't make him the enemy.

When will you finally realize all of these paranoid leaps you're taking? When will you finally admit to yourself: "Gee, I might not be right. I can't prove I'm right. Maybe I shouldn't disregard the views of Ron Paul's campaign and millions of supporters. Maybe I shouldn't tear people down and drive wedges into this movement just because I think they might not be perfect libertarians?"

Why are some Christians such

Why are some Christians such liberty haters? That shit pisses me off

I always thought he liked

I always thought he liked Ron Paul, but that doesn't mean he didn't do a hit piece on him. Did the "hookers" story come from Carlson?

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Yes Kevin it was a story on msnbc on Tv I think right before

Iowa. Not an article he wrote. It was a hitpiece on tv. It hurt Ron Paul in a state where the evangelical vote is the most important. It was then carried by abc on their "nightly news". Really a hit piece. In a Republican primary it is not what a Republican needs. Guilt by association. As if Ron Paul endorses prostitution and brothels
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?...

Pimp My Ride…

The article which Tucker wrote for The New Republic, got a lot of positive attention among many intelligent audiences which had not previously been provoked to pay attention.

http://gordonunleashed.co...

I recall it was the subject of an excellent, positive, pro- Ron Paul interview of Tucker on NPR, for example. The story angle also caused prurient human interest attention to which television broadcasters cater, demonstrating Tucker knows how to finesse media. The complacent flock that still bleats at the staff wielded by the likes of Pastor Huckabee cannot be expected to lift their collective heads from grazing to notice the nuances behind Tucker’s Bunny Ranch media ploy for the cause. This sort of audience should never be the focus because they generally cannot be expected to form impressions independent of the Sheppard’s who will undoubtedly herd them down other paths.

“… we can send a car to find you,
If you ever loose your way.”

Tucker went to the Bunny Ranch because they supported Ron Paul.

Cost him the Christian vote?

Oh dear.

How many of those righteous voters have their hands out for government "cheese" in one form or another?

Since when is theft acceptable but not a mutually beneficial exchange between two consenting adults?

___________

Lisa C.

“Elections are short term efforts; revolutions are long term projects.”

--Ron Paul

Join the rEVOLution here: http://www.campaignforlib...

Because he's got nothing better to do...

He lost his gig on messnbc remember.

Tucker IS a Shill

For the establishment. His nice nice only went so far. However it would be wise to use these bastards to OUR advantage. I say if it garners publicity to the movement, we can ALL pretend Tucker is a nice guy.

tucker had kirchick on

Fortune Favors the Bold

after the story already broke. If you've seen the interview, tucker made kirchick look like a fool.

shut up

seriously. Do you have no social skills whatsoever? All good journalists ask tough questions. They can't give everyone a free ride, even those that they like. Tucker said he would vote for Ron Paul and gave us favorable coverage when no one else would.

Please just shut up.

I agree...

Also, having him as the MC doesn't hurt our movement's credibility which is a huge plus. I wasn't too happy though that they invited Wilie Nelson...haha, I Love the guy, but MSM is going to be all over that thus putting us in a position which we could avoid.

Free Willie

And we would want to avoid having the MSM all over our positions.....ah...um...why?

I wont shut up dude. Make me

__________
Video message from Dr. Chuck Baldwin to all his fellow Revolutionaries
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Notoveryet, allow me to

Notoveryet, allow me to introduce you to the key Barr promoters of the day, who have taken the mantle from Billydee/JustCantGetEnough.

'The Producer' plays Bad Cop.
'JFEJ004 ' plays Good Cop.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

haha Tuma always cracks me up...

Tuma, you have to realize that if someone's name is not Ron Paul they are not always the enemy. This is not a cookie cutter world like you seem to believe, and everyone will not be in favor of all of your ideas. I am going to assume by the tone of your post that you wouldn't want Tucker as the MC. I disagree on your position, and I believe he lends us credibility which our movement is thirsting for. Ron Paul agrees with the decision obviously, and I agree with the decision for the choice of MC due to what he offers us.

Kevin, please remember neither Barr nor Baldwin is the enemy here...don't lose sight of the big picture

no kidding

Tucker really screwed Ron and he STILL lost his show for even slightly breaking the blackout.....tucker was the only guy who would give him any real play outside of cavuto or Becks crap placation piece.

I dont trust Tucker period.

an invitation

I would think that he was invited by the Doc and his people. Dr. Paul must know things about Tucker that we do not. He's primarily an entertainer.

Right on. AND the fact that

Right on. AND the fact that he is willing to do it, speaks volumes.